Hip joint endoprosthetics (total endoprosthetics, unipolar endoprosthetics) in Clinic No. 10 of the Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine

The goal of Hip Arthroplasty - is not simply a "spare part replacement," but the restoration of the femoral offset (moment arm) and the center of rotation of the joint. Improper restoration of these parameters leads to limping, gluteal muscle weakness, and rapid implant wear.

 

Hip Arthroplasty in Kyiv ☎ +38 (063) 310-30-50, Konstantin Vdovichenko | at Clinic No. 10, ITO NAMSU, Kyiv, Ukraine

 

Duration of surgery: 60-90 minutes.
Hospital stay after surgery: 7-14 days.

 

Indications for hip arthroplasty

  • degenerative-dystrophic diseases of the hip joint (arthrosis, arthritis, cystic remodeling of the femoral head, ankylosis of the hip joint);
  • femoral neck fracture;
  • Bechterew's disease, rheumatoid arthritis;
  • tumor-like lesion of the femoral head;
  • femoral neck pseudoarthrosis.

 

Anatomical and Biomechanical Rationale for Intervention

The hip joint is the largest ball-and-socket joint in the human body, providing the transfer of axial load from the torso to the lower extremities. In a normal state, the coefficient of friction in the joint is negligibly small due to hyaline cartilage and synovial fluid. During degeneration (coxarthrosis), this mechanism is destroyed, turning the joint into a zone of constant inflammation and mechanical obstruction.

The success of the surgery is determined by the accuracy of recreating the center of rotation and offset, which is critical for normalizing biomechanics and the longevity of the components.

Etiology, Pathogenesis, and Precision Diagnostics

A deep understanding of the pathological process dictates the choice of surgical tactics. Coxarthrosis is not an isolated cartilage injury; it is a disease of the entire organ, including the subchondral bone, synovial membrane, and ligamentous apparatus.

1. Etiological Factors and Pathogenetic Chains:

  • Idiopathic Coxarthrosis: Genetically determined degeneration associated with impaired synthesis of Type II collagen and proteoglycans.
  • Avascular Necrosis (AVN): Infarction of the femoral head. The pathogenesis is linked to the occlusion of the microcirculatory bed (due to glucocorticoid intake, alcohol intoxication, or post-traumatic thrombosis), leading to the collapse of bone trabeculae under load.
  • Dysplasia (DDH): Congenital disruption of the acetabular geometry, leading to pathological stress concentration on a small area of cartilage.

 

2. Advanced Diagnostic Protocol:

  • Radiographic Planning according to Crowe: Assessment of the degree of head dislocation in dysplasia. Mandatory performance of images in the "standing" position to assess pelvic tilt and true limb shortening.
  • Multidetector CT (MDCT): Allows for the assessment of "bone stock" and detection of cystic remodeling, which may require bone grafting during surgery.
  • Laboratory Panel: Analysis of bone resorption markers (P1NP, Osteocalcin) and exclusion of occult infection (CRP, ESR, specific tests for inflammatory arthritides).

 

Comprehensive differential diagnosis and assessment of bone stock allow for individualized tactics in coxarthrosis, necrosis, or dysplasia.

Deep Classification and Implant Materials Science

The choice of the bearing surface and the type of fixation is a strategic decision that determines the "survivorship" of the joint over a distance of decades.

1. Evolution of Tribological Pairs:

  • Highly Cross-linked Polyethylene (XLPE): Subjected to gamma irradiation to create additional molecular bonds, which reduces volumetric wear by 80-90% compared to conventional polyethylene. The addition of Vitamin E (alpha-tocopherol) neutralizes free radicals, preventing brittle failure (oxidation).
  • Biolox Delta: Modern pink ceramic (alumina-zirconia composite). It possesses extreme hardness and hydrophilicity, allowing it to maintain a lubricant layer even at low movement speeds.

 

2. Surface Engineering and Osseointegration:

  • Tantalum Coating: Has a porosity of up to 80%, which is as close as possible to the trabecular structure of human bone. Bone does not just adhere to the metal; it grows through it, creating a single biological block.
  • Hydroxyapatite (HA) Coating: A bioactive coating that stimulates osteoblasts to immediately form bone tissue on the implant surface.

 

The use of highly cross-linked polyethylene, ceramics, and tantalum coatings minimizes tribological wear and guarantees reliable osseointegration.

Technological Analysis of Global Manufacturers and Their Markings

In this section, we move to a detailed breakdown of the instruments used by top-tier surgeons. Each brand represents not just a piece of metal, but a philosophy of biomechanics.

1. Zimmer Biomet (USA/Switzerland) - Leadership in Osseointegration

  • ML Taper Stem: A wedge-shaped stem providing excellent primary fixation in the metaphysis.
  • Trabecular Metal (TM) System: A unique material made of tantalum. Unlike a coating, it is a structural porous metal. It is used in the most complex cases of revision arthroplasty when the patient's bone is almost non-existent.
  • G7 Acetabular System: A modular cup that allows the surgeon to choose between various liners (ceramic or polyethylene) directly during the procedure.

 

2. DePuy Synthes (Johnson & Johnson) - Precision and Biomimetics

  • Corail Stem: The most implanted cementless stem in the world. Its success is due to full hydroxyapatite coverage and a shape that perfectly distributes the load on the femur, preventing "stress shielding" effects that lead to bone resorption.
  • Pinnacle System: A cup with a massive clinical background (over 20 years of observation). It features high variability in orientation angles.
  • AltiVate Bearing Surface: Proprietary developments in the field of cross-linked polyethylene with antioxidants.

 

3. Stryker (USA) - Robotics and 3D Design

  • Accolade II Stem: Created based on a CT scan database of thousands of patients. It has a morphometric design that "seats" into the femoral canal more tightly than standard wedges.
  • Trident II Cup (Tritanium): Manufactured using 3D printing (additive manufacturing). This allows for a surface with controlled porosity that maximally mimics cancellous bone.
  • MAKO Integration: Stryker promotes the concept of robotic-assisted arthroplasty, where the installation accuracy of their implants is monitored by software in real-time.

 

4. Smith & Nephew (UK) - Tribological Innovations

  • Oxinium Technology: The "king" of tribology. A metal alloy (zirconium-niobium) whose surface is transformed into ceramic through thermal treatment. The result is a head that is as strong as metal (shatter-resistant) but as smooth as ceramic (minimal polyethylene wear).
  • Anthology Stem: A versatile system for all types of bone canals.
  • R3 Cup: A multi-purpose system with optimized liner engagement.

 

5. Aesculap (B. Braun, Germany) - German Conservatism and Reliability

  • Excia Stem: A classic example of German engineering. Very stable, often used with cemented fixation in elderly patients.
  • Plasmafit Cup: Features plasma titanium spray with a roughness providing a "sandpaper effect," which eliminates implant micromotion in the early period.

 

Global industry leaders offer additive technologies, Oxinium, and Trabecular Metal, ensuring superiority in primary stability and longevity of prostheses.

Clinical Recommendations for Implant Selection

  • Young Age (patients under 50 years):
    • Recommended solutions: Smith & Nephew systems with Oxinium heads or Zimmer Biomet systems with ceramic-on-ceramic bearings.
    • Rationale: Ensuring maximum bearing resource (over 25-30 years) and minimizing the volume of wear debris.
  • Presence of Systemic Osteoporosis:
    • Recommended solutions: DePuy Corail stems (with full hydroxyapatite fixation) or Aesculap Excia cemented stems.
    • Rationale: Creating reliable primary fixation in conditions of reduced bone trabecular density, preventing periprosthetic fractures.
  • Complex Anatomy and Pronounced Dysplasia:
    • Recommended solutions: Stryker Accolade II stems with morphometric design or individualized 3D-printed implants.
    • Rationale: Maximally accurate adaptation of implant geometry to a non-standard or deformed medullary canal.
  • Revision Intervention (replacement of an old prosthesis):
    • Recommended solutions: Zimmer Biomet systems based on Trabecular Metal (tantalum cones and cups).
    • Rationale: High tantalum porosity allows for the replacement of significant bone defects and provides biological fixation where standard titanium coatings are powerless.

 

Profiling the patient by age and bone quality dictates the choice between ceramic bearings, hydroxyapatite coating, and revision systems.

Regenerative Technologies and Orthobiological Synergism

The modern approach considers biological therapy as a foundation that allows for the optimization of tissue status at all stages of surgical treatment. The use of cellular and molecular technologies is aimed at managing inflammation, stimulating angiogenesis, and accelerating tissue integration.

1. Hyaluronic Acid (Viscosupplementation)

  • Preoperatively: Used to manage reactive synovitis and improve synovial fluid rheology, allowing for the preservation of range of motion and preventing muscle contractures until the radical intervention.
  • Postoperatively: Injection into adjacent joints (knee, contralateral hip) helps compensate for temporarily changed biomechanical loads and prevent their degradation.

 

2. PRP Therapy (Platelet-Rich Plasma)

  • Intraoperatively: Treatment of soft tissues and the joint capsule with PRP stimulates neoangiogenesis, reduces postoperative edema, and accelerates scarring without the formation of gross adhesions.
  • Rehabilitation: Local injections into the muscle attachment zone (e.g., gluteus medius) during persistent pain syndrome accelerate their recovery.

 

3. SVF (Stromal Vascular Fraction) - Stromal Vascular Fraction

  • Fundamental Action: Possesses a powerful immunomodulatory effect. MSCs within the SVF suppress the activity of catabolic enzymes (MMPs) that destroy tissues and secrete exosomes that stimulate regeneration.
  • Combined Effect: The use of SVF in combination with PRP creates synergy: PRP gives an immediate signal for healing, while SVF provides long-term regenerative support.

 

4. BMAC (Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate) - Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate

  • Application in Avascular Necrosis: Introduction of BMAC into the necrotic focus of the femoral head (Core Decompression + BMAC) in early stages can delay endoprosthetics for many years by stimulating osteogenesis.
  • Optimization of Results: Injection of BMAC into the osteotomy or bone grafting zone during endoprosthetics significantly accelerates graft remodeling and its fusion with the patient's bone.

 

5. Integrated Protocols and Rehabilitation Timelines

The combination of these methods allows for the realization of the "biological preparation" concept for the joint:

  • Stage 1 (Prehabilitation): Course of PRP + Hyaluronic acid to reduce the inflammatory background.
  • Stage 2 (Intraoperative): Use of BMAC or SVF in high-risk zones (bone defects, damaged muscles).
  • Result: Reduction of hospital stay by 20-30%, decreased need for NSAIDs, and acceleration of the transition to full weight-bearing due to higher quality healing of the soft tissue component of the joint.

 

The integration of PRP, SVF, and BMAC creates regenerative synergism, accelerating angiogenesis and shortening rehabilitation timelines.

Fundamental Surgical Strategies and Biomechanical Reconstruction

Surgical intervention represents the pinnacle of orthopaedic engineering. The choice of approach and reconstruction method determines not only the speed of healing but also the multi-year stability of the entire system.

1. Deep Decomposition of Surgical Approaches

  • Direct Anterior Approach (DAA):
    • Anatomical Rationale: The only truly intermuscular and internervous path. The incision passes in the gap between the m. tensor fasciae latae and m. sartorius.
    • Advantages: Full preservation of the posterior stabilizers (short rotators) and the gluteus maximus. This ensures phenomenal primary stability.
    • Clinical Significance: Minimal risk of dislocation and absence of restrictions on the "cross-legged" position in the early period.
  • Anterolateral Approach (Watson-Jones):
    • Methodology: Penetrates between the gluteus medius and the m. tensor fasciae latae. Requires partial detachment of the anterior fibers of the gluteus medius.
    • Application: Ideal for patients with morbid obesity or when massive bone grafting of the acetabular roof is required.
  • Posterior and Posterolateral Approaches (Moore/Kocher-Langenbeck):
    • Features: The classic "gold standard" for revisions. Requires transection of the short rotators of the hip with their subsequent precision repair.
    • Risks: Statistically higher probability of dislocation if protocols are not followed, yet provides the widest possible view for working with complex bone defects.

 

2. Principles of Precision Reconstruction of Offset and Center of Rotation

  • Medialization of the Center of Rotation: Deep reaming of the acetabulum allows the center of rotation to be shifted medially, reducing the load on the bearing surface and increasing the moment arm of the abductor muscles.
  • Restoration of Offset (Head Lateralization): Proper selection of the implant neck length prevents impingement and guarantees muscle tension, eliminating limping.
  • Stability Testing (Range of Motion): Performance of dynamic tests on the operating table to exclude dislocation at extreme angles of flexion and rotation.

 

3. Methodology of Bone Bed Preparation

  • Stepwise Reaming Technique: Use of hemispherical reamers with a 1–2 mm step to form an ideally congruent bed for the cup. Preservation of subchondral bone is the key to preventing implant subsidence (protrusion).
  • Broaching of the Femoral Canal: Use of rasps whose geometry strictly corresponds to the shape of the selected stem to create a "press-fit" effect, providing immediate fixation.

 

The choice of direct anterior approach and the realization of press-fit fixation ensure ideal primary stability and the prevention of dislocations.

Management Protocol for Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures

A periprosthetic fracture is one of the most formidable complications, requiring immediate application of the Vancouver Classification (Duncan & Masri) to determine treatment tactics.

1. Stage of Primary Verification and Classification

  • Type A (Trochanteric region): Fractures of the greater or lesser trochanter. Often require conservative treatment or cerclage wire fixation, as the stem remains stable.
  • Type B (Around the stem or just below):
    • B1: Stem is stable. Requires osteosynthesis (plates, cerclage).
    • B2: Stem is unstable. Requires revision arthroplasty (stem replacement with a long revision stem).
    • B3: Stem is unstable + bone stock deficiency. Requires complex revision with bone grafting or oncological megaprostheses.

     

  • Type C (Well below the stem): Treated as a standard diaphyseal fracture, managed with plate osteosynthesis.

 

2. Surgical Protocol for Instability (Types B2 and B3)

  • Approach: Extended lateral approach, often with an extended trochanteric osteotomy (ETO) for safe removal of the old implant and cement mantle.
  • Implantation: Use of cementless distally-fixed stems (Wagner type). The stem must bypass the fracture zone by at least two diaphyseal diameters, fixing in healthy bone.
  • Reinforcement: Mandatory use of additional internal fixation plates and titanium cerclage bands to create an "internal corset."

 

3. Biological Optimization of Union

  • Autografting: Use of bone chips from the iliac crest.
  • Cellular Therapy: Injection of bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) directly into the fracture gap to stimulate angiogenesis and consolidation.

 

The use of the Vancouver Classification determines the need for osteosynthesis or revision arthroplasty upon the loss of stability of the implant.

Physico-Chemical Principles of Cemented Fixation and Thermal Risk Management

In cases where biological fixation is not possible, bone cement - polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) - is used. Understanding the processes occurring during its curing is critical for the survival of bone tissue.

1. Polymerization Mechanism and Exothermic Reaction

  • Exothermic Peak: During curing, the temperature within the cement mass can reach 80–90°C.
  • Thermal Necrosis: Bone proteins (collagen) begin to denature at temperatures above 50–55°C. If the cement layer is too thick or proper cooling is absent, this can lead to osteocyte death at the "cement-bone" interface, which will trigger loosening in the future.

 

2. Engineering Strategies for Minimizing Damage

  • Vacuum Mixing: Allows for the removal of air bubbles, increasing cement density and reducing the risk of microfractures, while also slowing down the uncontrolled temperature spike.
  • Pre-cooling of Components: Storing the monomer in a refrigerator allows for stretching the working phase and lowering the peak reaction temperature.
  • Pressurization Technique: Use of cement guns and canal plugs allows cement to penetrate deeply into bone pores (by 3–5 mm), creating a reliable mechanical lock (interlock) before critical heating occurs.

 

3. Antibiotic Prophylaxis in the PMMA Structure

  • Elution Mechanism: After hardening, the antibiotic begins to slowly leach from the cement surface directly into the surgical site.
  • Advantage: Creation of ultra-high drug concentrations locally, which is impossible to achieve with intravenous administration without the risk of systemic toxicity.

 

Control of the exothermic reaction and the application of vacuum mixing prevent thermal necrosis and ensure a strong interlock.

Pharmacological Support and Perioperative Management

1. Anticoagulant Therapy and Hemostasis

  • Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs): Selective Factor Xa or direct thrombin inhibitors. Provide a stable effect without the need for INR monitoring, reducing the risk of PE by 5-7 times.
  • Low Molecular Weight Heparins (LMWH): Used in the early postoperative period in patients with high bleeding risk or renal failure.
  • Antifibrinolytics: Intraoperative use allows for blocking clot breakdown, reducing total blood loss by up to 40%.

 

2. Multimodal Analgesia and Inflammation Management

  • Selective COX-2 Inhibitors: Allow for reducing systemic inflammation without damaging the gastric mucosa or affecting platelet aggregation.
  • Local Anesthetics: Used for Local Infiltration Analgesia (LIA) of soft tissues around the prosthesis directly during wound closure.
  • Neuromodulators: Used in chronic pain syndrome before surgery to desensitize the nervous system.

 

3. Management of Patients with Comorbid Diabetes Mellitus

  • Short and Ultra-short Acting Insulins: Used on the day of surgery to maintain target glycemia levels below 10 mmol/L.
  • SGLT2 Inhibitors: Require discontinuation several days before intervention to avoid the risk of euglycemic ketoacidosis.
  • Cephalosporin Antibiotics: Mandatory perioperative prophylaxis starting 30-60 minutes before the incision.

 

Multimodal analgesia and the use of DOACs minimize VTE risks and provide conditions for early mobilization.

Total Rehabilitation and Prevention of Complications

1. Kinesiotherapy and Recovery Phases:

  • Protection Phase (0-6 weeks): Formation of a pseudocapsule of the joint. Exclusion of adduction and internal rotation.
  • Strengthening Phase (6-12 weeks): Focus on the gluteus medius - the main stabilizer of the pelvis. If this muscle is weak, the patient will have a Trendelenburg gait.
  • Proprioceptive Training: Exercises on unstable platforms to restore the "brain-joint" connection.

 

2. Systemic Prevention:

  • Antithrombotic Therapy: Use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for 35 days - a strict standard for preventing PE.
  • Infection Control: Lifelong vigilance. Any dental intervention or urological manipulation must be accompanied by an "antibiotic shield" so that bacteria do not settle on the implant (biofilm formation).

 

Restoration of the gluteus medius and strict infection control are guarantors of the long-term functioning of the endoprosthesis.

Fundamental Synthesis of Method and Synergetic Combinations

A deep analysis of the presented material allows for the classification of modern hip arthroplasty not as a discrete operation, but as a multifactorial medical-engineering process. The effectiveness of this method is based on "three pillars": precision biomechanical reconstruction, tribological excellence of materials, and active biological management of regeneration.

The key conclusion is that achieving long-term implant survivorship (over 25-30 years) is impossible without transitioning from a purely mechanistic paradigm to bioorthopaedic integration. The combination of materials science (use of Oxinium, Biolox Delta, XLPE) and digital planning (based on MDCT and MAKO robotics) neutralizes risks of premature wear and aseptic instability. However, it is precisely the integration of regenerative medicine methods, such as PRP therapy, SVF, and BMAC concentrate, that allows for overcoming the biological "bone-metal" barrier, turning the prosthesis from a foreign body into a functional part of a living system.

The synergy of surgical approaches (particularly the direct anterior approach) with modern pharmacological support protocols (use of DOACs and multimodal analgesia) cardinally changes the patient recovery profile, providing early activation and preventing periprosthetic complications. Thus, the fundamental quality standard today is not just an installed endoprosthesis, but an individualized combination of high-tech mechanics and cellular biology, aimed at the full restoration of the anthropometric and social function of the individual.

The ultimate effectiveness of the method is achieved exclusively through interdisciplinary synthesis, where diagnostic accuracy, surgical technique, materials science, and biological stimulation form a single high-tech treatment ecosystem. It is vital to consult an orthopaedic surgeon in time for timely and effective intervention, which is the only guarantee for obtaining an optimal result and preserving a high quality of life.

Hip Arthroplasty is a triumph of engineering thought and medicine. Fundamental success here lies in the interdisciplinary approach: from the metallurgy of the implant to the molecular composition of the synovial environment and the physical chemistry of polymers. We are on the threshold of an era where biotechnology will allow for growing joints in vivo, but until that moment, total replacement remains the most reliable way to return a person to an active life.

 


If you need consultation about Hip Arthroplastycall +38 (063) 310-30-50, we will always help!

Consultation on the issue of Hip Arthroplasty is conducted by the orthopedic traumatologist Vdovichenko Konstantin Vitalievich